◇AgentCover
DEFINE THE LOSS BEFORE THE PRICE

Define the loss.
Then discuss the price.

An agent’s value can indicate business dependence, but it is not automatically an insured loss. Risk discussion also needs permissions, exposure, controls and verifiable evidence.

ContextPossible eventLoss to defineKey question
Personal assistantWrong bookings, file changes or purchases outside authorizationNon-refundable spending, direct expenses and restorationWhat was authorized, and has any refund already been received?
Business agentIncorrect payments, interruption or erroneous customer commitmentsNet funds lost, evidenced interruption and third-party claimsWho held the tool permissions, and can approvals be traced?
Sensitive informationDisclosure of private or confidential contentInvestigation, notification, remediation and related liabilityWhich data, recipients and contractual boundaries are involved?
Unauthorized activityExecution after revocation or changed oversightContainment, forensics, recovery and affected operationsAre controls independent of the agent?

Make the coverage discussion specific

Specify the protected person or organization, agent and tools, event trigger, loss calculation, deductible, limit, waiting period, exclusions and evidence. An agent can submit structured information; doing so does not itself create an insurance contract.

Separate probability from consequence

An experiment shows a possible behavior; it does not tell you how often your workflow will experience it. Explore loss and limits using explicit assumptions, then calibrate with operational and incident data. Keep unsupported inputs uncertain.

AgentCover is a research and calculation prototype. There is no policy, insurer, premium collection or claims service. These questions are a design framework, not a promise about any existing insurance product.
Open the pricing sandbox →